Leading with Heart: Why Humanity Belongs in Leadership
Written by Sarah Mullin
Deputy Headteacher and EdD student
When Chancellor Rachel Reeves appeared tearful during Prime Minister’s Questions, it became national news. Speculation followed. Some questioned her professionalism. Others expressed empathy. But what if her emotion wasn’t about weakness or pressure — what if it simply showed that she cared?
We may never know what Reeves was feeling, and that’s not the point. What matters is how society responded. In contrast, when Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s voice cracked with emotion moments earlier, many praised his sincerity. The double standard reminds us that we still judge emotional expression differently in men and women — and that’s something schools have the power to change.
In my doctoral research with women secondary headteachers, many shared the pressure to appear composed at all times. One told me:
“I’ve learned to hide my emotions because if I show them, people assume I’m not coping.”
Another said:
“I care deeply about my staff and pupils. But there’s still a sense that to be respected, you have to be hard.”
This expectation isn’t just unfair — it’s limiting. When we reduce leadership to stoicism, we ignore the relational skills that make leaders truly effective: empathy, emotional intelligence, and care.
That’s why these public moments of emotion matter. Because our young people are watching.
Girls need to see that leadership doesn’t require hiding your feelings or shrinking your identity. That you can be strong, successful, and still be yourself. And boys need to see that care and vulnerability aren’t weaknesses — they are part of responsible, emotionally mature leadership.
In schools, we have the chance to model a broader, healthier version of what leadership looks like — not just in what we say, but in how we lead. Staff and students alike benefit from environments where humanity is welcomed, not hidden.
Let’s create a culture where showing heart doesn’t undermine leadership — it defines it.
Courageous Conversations
Written by Hannah Wilson
Founder of Diverse Educators
What is a Courageous Conversation?
In courageous conversations, whether in the context of performance appraisal, mentoring, or coaching, individuals are encouraged to express their views openly and truthfully, rather than defensively or with the purpose of laying blame. Integral to courageous conversations is an openness to learn.
What Is an Example of a Courageous Conversation?
Typical examples include handling conflict, confronting a colleague, expressing an unpopular idea on a team, asking for a favour, saying no to a request for a favour, asking for a raise, or trying to have a conversation with someone who is avoiding you. Research shows that many women find such “courageous conversations” challenging.
How Do You Frame a Courageous Conversation?
- Set your intentions clearly.
- Create a container.
- Prepare facilitators & groups.
- Set it up.
- Open with vulnerability.
- Have the discussion.
- Come back together and close.
- Support each other.
What Does the Research Tell Us About Courageous Conversations?
According to the work of Susan Scott there are The Seven Principles of Fierce Conversations:
- Master the courage to interrogate reality. Are your assumptions valid? Has anything changed? What is now required of you? Of others?
- Come out from behind yourself into the conversation and make it real. When the conversation is real, change can occur before the conversation is over.
- Be here, prepared to be nowhere else. Speak and listen as if this is the most important conversation you will ever have with this person.
- Tackle your toughest challenge today. Identify and then confront the real obstacles in your path. Confrontation should be a search for the truth. Healthy relationships include both confrontation and appreciation.
- Obey your instincts. During each conversation, listen for more than content. Listen for emotion and intent as well. Act on your instincts rather than passing them over for fear that you could be wrong or that you might offend.
- Take responsibility for your emotional wake. For a leader there is no trivial comment. The conversation is not about the relationship; the conversation is the relationship. Learning to deliver the message without the load allows you to speak with clarity, conviction, and compassion.
- Let silence do the heavy lifting. Talk with people, not at them. Memorable conversations include breathing space. Slow down the conversation so that insight can occur in the space between words.
Let’s talk about the criticisms of EDI work
Written by Shammi Rahman
Shammi is a Diversity and Equalities Adviser for HFL Education and a former member of the Advisory Board for the Children's Commissioner. She brings 19 years of secondary education experience, specialising in Religious Studies. Shammi has played a key role in promoting high-quality Religious Education as an Executive Leader for NATRE,working with SACRE boards and providing support for teaching Islam at GCSE and A Level. With a background in championing community cohesion and interfaith activities with young people in Milton Keynes, Shammi advocates for diverse student voices. Dedicated to enhancing race equity in education, she supports school leaders through bespoke support or training for a more inclusive educational landscape.
I’m very aware of the conversations happening across organisations amongst EDI (Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion) professionals on LinkedIn and those facing growing scrutiny. Whether from leadership, colleagues, wider society or online, there are increasingly vocal critiques about how EDI is approached and who is seen as credible in the space. Understanding these criticisms, whether we agree with them or not, helps us engage more thoughtfully and improve the impact of this vital work so we can all work together with meaning.
Here are some of the common criticisms I am seeing being expressed:
- Questioning Authenticity and Expertise – the idea that some EDI professionals are self-appointed or lack formal expertise.
- Questioning Motivations and Job Security – A belief that some professionals are driven more by job preservation or ideology than by organisational outcomes.
- Perceived Bias – Advisers seen as leaning left politically, overly virtuous, or part of ideological “echo chambers.”
- Questioning Communication Style – some feel the language can feel “othering” or overly dramatic, especially around race, and allyship.
- Questioning the Emotional Impact – seeing Distress in the workplace as real but sometimes viewed as performative or exaggerated.
- Framing – as “black-and-white thinking,” often linked (rightly or wrongly) to neurodivergent traits or rigid ideologies.
- Concerns about Social Justice Orientation – the idea that the work is politically motivated or aligned with activist agendas.
Many of these critiques misunderstand the depth and purpose of equity work, while some raise perfectly important challenges that EDI leaders should reflect on. I think a much deeper understanding is essential for anyone engaging in this space, both those who support EDI and those questioning it to move forward with greater clarity, purpose, and mutual respect.
So how do we navigate pushback? Here are my reflections:
Working in the field of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) and in my role, specifically focusing on race and religion, is incredibly rewarding, but it comes with its own challenges, which I personally find helpful in helping me understand better and reassess how I help people. It is particularly interesting when faced with resistance or pushback because these challenges can manifest in many forms, from scepticism about the value of the work to outright dismissal of lived experiences.
As someone who left the teaching profession because I knew, and have known, for many years education has much work to do in race equity and understanding faith communities better, I have been very grateful to have been working closely with some of the most inspiring school leaders, but I want to share some personal reflections on these challenges.
The goal isn’t to point fingers and I don’t know anyone who has that intention. My intentions are to foster understanding and open the door for more honest, respectful conversations, even if we disagree, about how we can all contribute to creating better, more inclusive workplaces. That’s the bottom line. More importantly for the benefit of doing right by the children and communities we serve and care about.
- The Struggle to be Heard: Questioning Experience and Expertise
One of the most frustrating aspects of EDI work is when your expertise or lived experience is questioned. The very people who are often asked to speak out about racism, exclusion, or marginalisation are met with scepticism about the validity of their experiences. It’s important to remember that for many of us in this space, we’re not just speaking from academic knowledge, we’re also sharing the experiences of colleagues, friends, and family members who face these challenges daily but often feel too unsafe to speak up. The real cost of these discussions is often invisible, but it is crucial to acknowledge and respect the lived experiences behind them. - The Burden of Proof: Constantly Justifying Your Claims
Another significant problem is the expectation to constantly “prove” the validity of what you’re saying. I’ve often found myself in situations where even after providing clear evidence, whether it’s research, statistics, or firsthand accounts, the response is to ask for more proof or dismiss the evidence entirely. This can be incredibly discouraging, as it implies that the experience or evidence being shared isn’t worthy of consideration. It’s essential that we move beyond the need for endless validation and start acknowledging the lived realities of those who have been marginalised. - The Dismissal of Personal Experience
Personal stories and experiences are powerful tools for change, yet they’re often dismissed as “emotional,” “biased,” or “misunderstood.” Phrases like “You would say that, wouldn’t you?” or “I think you misunderstood” can undermine the point of the conversation. We have to recognise that personal stories are not just anecdotes, they are a crucial part of understanding the broader systemic issues. When these stories are minimised or invalidated, we lose an opportunity to connect and find solutions to problems behind the issues. - Political Labels: Don’t Pigeonhole EDI Advocates
One of the challenges of working in EDI is the tendency to be pigeonholed into a political category. People often try to label EDI advocates as “left-leaning” or “activists,” which oversimplifies our perspectives. The reality is many of us don’t fit neatly into these boxes. In fact, some of us have experienced racism from self-proclaimed liberals or left-leaning individuals. EDI advocates come from diverse backgrounds and political ideologies, just as people with racist views do and it’s important to respect that there is diversity of thought amongst all groups. The work we do is not about political affiliation, it’s about creating spaces where everyone can thrive. - Race and Religion: The Topics We Often Avoid
Why have I focused on these two protected characteristics? Not only can I relate to them, I also know many real stories of discrimination that have and still prevent people from enjoying a fulfilling career or school experience. While all protected characteristics are important, there is a consistent pattern where discussions around race and religion are either avoided or deprioritised. This is often a silent issue in many workplaces where conversations about race or religion are treated as uncomfortable or taboo. This lack of focus on these critical issues only perpetuates the marginalisation of those who experience racial or religious discrimination. So that is why it’s vital that we prioritise these conversations (where it is needed) and create environments where they can happen openly and without fear of retaliation. - Allyship and Accountability: Why It Matters
The concept of allyship often makes some leaders uncomfortable because it involves acknowledging their own role in creating change and can feel threatening. But the truth is, we cannot continue to rely on ethnically minoritised individuals to bear the burden of EDI work. Leaders, especially those with power and influence, must be held accountable for creating inclusive environments. If leadership doesn’t take responsibility for EDI efforts, progress will always be limited. True allyship involves accountability, and it’s time for those in power to step up and lead effectively and that is where my energy lies and why allyship is needed. - The Impact of Racism on Well-Being: It’s Not Exaggerated
Another reality that often gets overlooked is the profound impact that discrimination can have on an individual’s health and well-being. Many people who speak out about their experiences with racism or discrimination do so at great personal risk. For some, the consequences are dire stress-related illnesses such as heart disease or high blood pressure are not uncommon. This isn’t an exaggeration. When individuals are forced to endure toxic work environments for years, it takes a toll on their mental and physical health. Recognising this harm is essential to making meaningful progress in the EDI space. - Stereotyping EDI Advocates: A Misunderstanding
A common stereotype about those working in EDI is that they are “ideologically rigid” or predominantly neurodivergent. This stereotype not only undermines the professionalism and rigour of EDI work, but it also perpetuates a harmful narrative about those who are dedicated to creating inclusive spaces. EDI work is not about rigid ideology, it’s about fostering environments that allow everyone to thrive, regardless of background. Reducing EDI practitioners to one-dimensional labels only serves to dismiss the complexity of the work and its importance. - Racism Is Political: It Doesn’t Stay Out of the Workplace
Some critics argue that EDI work is too political. But the reality is that racism and discrimination are inherently political, they are driven by policies, social norms, and cultural attitudes that affect every part of society, including the workplace. The influence of politics doesn’t stop at the doors of the office. National and local political agendas that perpetuate racism and discrimination impact everyone, including employees. It’s crucial that we understand the broader societal forces at play and work to mitigate their effects in our organisations instead of ignoring them and again, expecting racially minoritised people to take the brunt of the negativity. - Creating Space for Open Conversations
Ultimately, tension and conflict within EDI spaces often arise when open, honest conversations aren’t welcomed or facilitated. For everyone to thrive in an organisation, we need to create spaces where all voices can be heard, where differences are respected, and where leadership is willing to listen, learn, and adapt. It’s only when we build good relations with one another and trust each other that we can truly work efficiently and inclusively.
Conclusion: A Call for Action
EDI work is not easy, but it is necessary. The challenges we face in navigating resistance, misunderstanding, and pushback are real, but they shouldn’t deter us from our mission. We need to keep the conversation going, foster empathy, and encourage leadership to take responsibility. Only then can we begin to create workplaces that are truly inclusive and equitable for everyone. This is not the time to cave into push back, this is the time to embrace and push back with something better, with collective strength, kindness and sustained commitment.
Switching on the local talent resource in international schools.
Written by Laura Mitchelson
Laura is a freelancer helping schools in Retention and Engagement. Previous roles include Director of Enrollment and Communications at Dwight School Hanoi, Impact and Innovation Unit Advisor at Qibao Dwight High School, Secondary Language Teacher at Millfield School.
According to the OECD’s Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018, the average annual professional development hours for teachers internationally is around 62 hours per year. Some would argue it should be more, some might debate the value of some of that PD but it’s there.
In other industries like healthcare, retail, finance, banking, IT and telecoms, the average number of hours of professional development received each year is also about 60 hours but there is one difference – in those industries, it doesn’t matter which part of the organisation you are from, you have access to the same amount of professional development – it might depend on how long you have been with the business or what level you are at, whereas in the international school sector, teachers almost always have access to many more hours of PD than their colleagues in the business management side of the school do.
When will Finance, IT, HR and Operations teams be given the same access to professional development and learning support as their teacher peers?
There is a lot to consider here – it is the road less travelled, so proceeding with caution makes sense. To start requires us looking at THREE things:
- What are the existing professional qualifications that school management team staff have? Are Finance Directors ACCA certified? Does the HR Manager have an SHRM certification? Does the IT Director have the CITM? Do school leaders and governors know these accreditations and their issuing bodies well enough to assess candidates at interview stage in these professions and does the school look for these at the recruitment stage?
- When, how and what should make up the professional development that these management team staff receive once they are at a school? Is there a career growth pathway, planned support for professional growth, where does the budget come from?
- Where can teaching and non-teaching staff come together in professional development? Soft skills development with a focus on areas like team leadership, project management, budgeting, running effective meetings, and reporting are all areas of growth that are common to educators and business managers.
By developing ALL staff, schools respect both the notion of professional growth in general, and allow these school management professionals to be seen on a level with the wonderfully qualified and heavily professionally developed teaching staff. It is appropriate and right that we shine a spotlight here.
Schools have a wide variety of options available to them when they embark on the professional development of their school business management teams. Here are some approaches that can be considered depending on the stage and needs of the individuals and teams in place:
- Internal or External Mentoring
- Coaching
- Shadow Days
- Language Lessons
- Observations
- Internal/External Training
- Online study
- Master’s Degree support
- On-the-job training
- Industry body membership
- Conference attendance
- Career Mapping
- High quality appraisals
- 360 appraisals
- Job rotation
- Internship programs
- Group coaching
- E-learning
- In-house workshops
- Day release to further education
- Supported Local/virtual networking
- Employee wellness programs
With a pay disparity between international teachers and those, often local staff, who work in ‘support’ roles like IT, Admin, HR, Finance and Operations, divisions and rifts can form, and by actively supporting the professional growth of those who work in these functions, schools can reap significant benefits in the areas of school reputation, retention, cross-departmental collaboration, and organisational resilience.
There is room for much more discussion of this topic in the coming years.
Inclusive leadership - a thought for caregivers
Written by Clare Haly
With a passion for truly inclusive teaching and learning, Clare has a background in education spanning 20 years. During this time, she has led at a senior level in both secondary and primary settings, improving whole school teaching and learning, cross-curricular literacy and staff development, and most recently Inclusion and SEND.
‘It is just so lonely. The playground, work, the other parents, the judgement and assumptions…It’s exhausting, and yes lonely…’
I am not the first person to comment on the complexities of flexible working. Thankfully voices are being raised that are far louder than mine, and there are some welcome shifts where understanding is beginning to seep in, that perhaps the ‘privilege’ of flexible working may actually be more of a necessity.
I get the challenge for leaders in education, I have lived it. We are teachers, we love our jobs, our vocation, our classes, our children. As if the Leadership do not have enough to think about. Children need excellent teachers in front of them, they require, and deserve consistency. But, and there is a but, it is well documented that teachers are leaving in droves, and this is not just because of the intense pressures of the job itself, but because caregiving responsibilities also really matter.
‘Family comes first’
There is no silver bullet or magic formula to help those people who find themselves in complex situations managing multiple caregiving roles. And this is not about the stereotype of the ‘working mum trying to have it all’. In the case referenced above, the man I speak of is grieving his wife who died suddenly. He has two sons, one aged 4 and the other just 6 months. This father also has an ageing parent, who is also bereaved and living with Parkinson’s disease. The logistical struggle is obvious. The emotional one is enormous. This man is also excellent at his job. One he cannot do well because of inflexibility at work. Imagine if his place of work was one of welcome and joy and a place where he could thrive within the time he could give knowing that that was enough. Instead he is rushed, stressed, apologetic, clock watching, anxious. Is this the premise for excellent output at work? What would the impact be of such a person in front of a class?
Part time does not mean part competent. Working flexibly does not mean working below par. Flexible working can be done well in schools. But it is yet to be the norm. It takes commitment, forward planning, clever recruitment, budgeting, compassion and a willingness to learn. It demands brave leadership with a trust in one’s staff and in oneself. But when successful, the outcomes are overwhelmingly positive. When teachers feel invested in, trusted, valued, they thrive. And the impact of a thriving, calm, indeed happy teacher on their pupils is not to be underestimated. You don’t need me to tell you that.
What I am questioning is how many of us truly practise this duty of care to well-being outside of the appraisal system and think holistically about the people that make our schools what they are, and the circumstances they live with outside of school. The amount of time I hear the well meaning phrases ‘family first’, ‘you must look after yourself’ – but in reality, as a caregiver, how is this meant to become your truth?
‘Middle years’
In Caroline Criado-Perez’ Invisible Women she points out that women in particular, are penalised socially and financially because of the assumed caregiving roles they carry. In our ‘middle years’ particularly, many of us as women, find ourselves not only grappling with the joys and complexities of raising children, but also tending to changing circumstances of family members, for those who become unwell, or the challenges that older age in particular can bring. So this is not about the balance of having children and having a career. This is about having a sense of empathy for the challenges staff face that pull them away from the classroom because they physically cannot be at the helm, rigidly, all the time. We are losing excellent, creative, inspirational practitioners because of a lack of flexibility.
The impact of stress on our educational colleagues and peers is well documented. The job is challenging enough without the guilt, pressure and constant stream of apology or sense of atonement that manifests itself while trying to juggle multiple adult responsibilities. I applaud those companies, institutions and yes, schools moving to acknowledge that life is not linear and that hours cannot always be rigid. But in education there is still some way to go.
Care packages and school clubs of course are invaluable and teachers that are also parents and/or caregivers are of course grateful for the support these services offer. But flexible working responds to more than logistics. Flexible working allows for improved wellbeing, not just time management: togetherness within whatever relationship has the need – in all phases of the caregiver spectrum, time for a neurodivergent child, an elderly parent, an unwell spouse; reflection, respite.
Being a caregiver should not be an alternative to a career in education, and too often teachers have to choose. I believe though that we have enough good educational leaders who have the creativity and courage to find a way to allow, indeed welcome, brilliant teachers back into school flexibly. Again: Part time does not mean part competent, flexible does not mean below par.
If we are to reach our ambition for a truly diverse edu-community then we must always be human first in our approach to how our schools are run. A truly inclusive school will empower their staff through flexible working where it is needed. As ever, it is all too easy to assume we know someone’s story. We must continue to look beyond appearances, there is always more than meets the eye.
My Experience as a Speaker at the Diverse Educators Conference in Scotland: A Step Towards Change
Written by Sadia Hussain-Şavuk
Sadia Hussain-Şavuk, originally a Biology teacher, is now a Diversity, Equality and Inclusion Lead working predominantly with schools within the independent sector providing teacher training, pupil workshops and consultancy in her main area of anti-racism. In addition to this she sits on a number of boards including the BSA/IELA Inclusion Advisory Board and is co-chair of the Curriculum Reforms workstream of the Anti-Racism in Education Programme.
In February, I had the incredible honour of speaking at the inaugural Diverse Educators Conference in Scotland. As the first event of its kind, the conference was a bold and inspiring step towards promoting inclusivity, representation, and meaningful change within education. The atmosphere was charged with energy, optimism, and a deep-seated belief in the power of education to shape a better future for all.
The Power of Positivity
One of the most striking things about the conference was the positivity and passion that the participants brought to the table. Educators from across Scotland, with diverse backgrounds and experiences, gathered together not only to share their ideas but to spark action. There was a sense of unity and purpose that made the event feel more like a movement than a typical conference. As I stood before such an engaged audience, it was incredibly reassuring to see how committed these educators were to making positive changes in their schools, classrooms, and communities. Whether it was promoting inclusivity in the curriculum, advocating for equitable opportunities, or fostering a more diverse learning environment, it was clear that the educators in the room were not just talking about change – they were living it. It’s moments like these that remind me why I became an educator in the first place: to make a difference. And seeing so many others who share that same drive was truly inspiring.
The Challenges We Still Face
Despite the immense positivity, there was an undercurrent of concern that stayed with me throughout the conference. While we celebrated the progress that has been made and the steps that are being taken to make education more inclusive, we cannot ignore the slow pace of change. It is difficult to not feel a sense of frustration when you consider how far we still have to go. Although there are pockets of progress, systemic barriers persist. In many schools, diverse perspectives are still sidelined or tokenised. Too often, young people with marginalised identities still face barriers to success, whether that be in terms of representation, access to resources, or the recognition of their unique challenges. As educators, we know that it’s not enough to simply raise awareness. The real work lies in creating long-term, sustainable change. But when progress is slow, it feels as though we are failing the very students we are meant to serve. The young people of today – those who will shape our tomorrow – are waiting for us to do better. And while I am hopeful for the future, it’s hard to ignore the gap between where we are now and where we need to be.
A Call to Action
The Diverse Educators Conference served as both a celebration of what’s been achieved and a reminder of the work that remains to be done. I left the event with a renewed sense of purpose, but also a deeper understanding of the urgent need for change. As educators, we must keep pushing the boundaries of what is possible. We must continue to challenge the status quo and demand that every child, regardless of their background, has access to a truly equitable education. We cannot afford to wait for change to happen on its own – we must be the ones to make it happen. The diversity, passion, and commitment I witnessed at the conference filled me with hope, but I also know that it will take all of us – working together, side by side – to ensure that the next generation of students can thrive in an educational system that fully supports their needs and potential. In the end, the Diverse Educators Conference wasn’t just a moment of celebration – it was a call to action. It was a reminder that our work is far from over, and that every step we take towards inclusivity and equity is a step closer to a brighter future for all. Let’s not rest until that future becomes a reality.
To Belong Is Not Enough: Why We Must Move Towards Mattering
Written by Mohamed Abdallah
With almost two decades of experience, Mohamed started his journey in youth work and pupil referral units before spearheading groundbreaking inclusive practices and systems as a leader in an 'Outstanding' all-through mainstream school. Driven by a relentless commitment to positive change, Mohamed now dedicates his efforts to collaborating with school leaders across the nation as the Head of the Inclusive Leadership Course at The Difference.
“No one would care if I weren’t here.”
I can remember the words hitting me hard. As Designated Safeguarding Lead there were immediate red flags, but on a human level it broke my heart.
100% attendance, great progress, and never in trouble. On paper he belonged – but in reality he thought nobody cared.
Across the country, I hear the language of belonging increasingly referenced in discussions about student engagement, wellbeing, and success. And I welcome it. It’s a refreshing shift in our narrative about the student experience.
Still, something didn’t feel right. Then, it clicked.
It is not enough to simply belong; you should also matter.
My experience has shown me that a student can belong to a school community without ever feeling that their presence or contributions truly matter. A friend recently shared a US study with me that revealed a surprising finding: a sense of ‘belonging’ to a school community did not significantly affect academic performance. But instead there were other factors that determined success, such as participation and self regulated learning.
Think about it this way: You belong to a gym, but do the regulars know your name? You belong to a workplace, but do your ideas shape the way things are done? You belong to a school, but when you are absent, is there a noticeable void?
Mattering is more than belonging to a place or a community; it is about your significance.
One of the most prominent academic advocates for mattering is the US community psychologist Isaac Prilleltensky. He argues that developing a strong sense of mattering depends on two things: feeling you are valued, and feeling that you add value – whether that be within your workplace, your community, your family, or your friendship group. In the UK, my good friend Luke Billingham has been one of the most influential thinkers and writers on young people and mattering.
The Three Components of Mattering in Schools
After multiple voice notes back and forth, Luke and I sat down to discuss this matter (see what I did there!), and we asked:
If a student stopped coming to school tomorrow, would they feel like their absence was noticed?
Does every student have positive and affirming relationships with peers and at least one adult?
Are students actively shaping the school environment, or are they simply complying with expectations?
These questions helped us think more deeply about mattering. Of course, students should belong. But would we be satisfied as school leaders with 100% attendance, high attainment, and zero suspensions, yet students still told us, “No one would care if I weren’t here”?
They should feel they matter.
Reflecting on our experiences in different schools, Luke and I identified some key factors which we think enable students to develop mattering; Voice, Relationships, and Participation.
- Voice: Too often, schools claim to prioritise student voice while keeping real decision-making at the leadership level. But voice is not just about being heard. Schools must embed student experience and perspectives into decision-making, not just through surveys, but by creating opportunities for meaningful dialogue and change. Even when student perspectives challenge us, they offer uncomfortable truths we must engage with. When students see their input shape school culture, they matter.
- Relationships: A student might belong to a school, but do they have relationships that affirm their worth? Schools could cultivate opportunities for positive peer relationships to create strong social bonds, and to ensure every student has at least one trusted adult. Relationships built on trust and recognition, and environments where students feel valued and connected.
- Participation: Mattering isn’t just about feeling noticed, it’s about feeling needed. Students need opportunities to contribute meaningfully to their school communities. This goes beyond enrichment clubs; it means ensuring that students are actively shaping their environments. Whether through student-led campaigns, or engaging with the local community, authentic participation allows students to see their impact.
Why Mattering Matters for Inclusion
I worry that belonging is being used as a catch-all solution for inclusion, or dare I say it, a form of soft inclusion. For many students from marginalised backgrounds, belonging can feel conditional. They may be required to turn up, but do they feel like their presence and identity are essential? Do they see themselves reflected in the curriculum? Are their voices shaping school systems? Are their experiences acknowledged and valued?
Mattering addresses these questions by ensuring that students are not just included, but recognised as integral members of their schools. For students from underrepresented backgrounds, the feeling of mattering can be a protective factor against marginalisation and disengagement.
If we stop at belonging, we risk creating schools where students exist but don’t thrive, they comply but are disengaged, are included but unseen. The real challenge for schools isn’t just inclusion. It’s significance. Instead of asking, ‘Do our students belong?’ ask, ‘Do they know they matter?’
How My Experiences with ADHD in Different Workplaces Led to a PhD and Training Programmes for Businesses and Schools
Written by Steve Ollington
ADHDer studying the pros and cons of ADHD in the workplace, with 19 years in digital marketing, and more recently running ADHD training.
I’m Steve Ollington, and I’m currently undertaking a PhD at Swansea University, supervised by Professor Brian Garrod, focusing on ADHD in the workplace. My research journey started with a personal observation: despite having a consistent skill set and high level of experience in my profession, I noticed that my performance varied significantly depending on the workplace environment. In some settings, I thrived; in others, I struggled to achieve the same level of productivity and job satisfaction. This discrepancy led me to examine how different workplace environments interact with ADHD traits, not just in terms of challenges, but also in enabling the often-overlooked strengths associated with ADHD.
Observing the Role of Environment in My ADHD Performance
In some roles, I was given autonomy and flexibility, which allowed me to excel. I had the freedom to approach tasks creatively, was trusted by managers, and felt supported by colleagues who understood different thinking styles. In these settings, I could harness the strengths that come with ADHD, for example innovative thinking and alternative (but effective) problem-solving. My performance was high, and I felt truly engaged in my work.
In other workplaces, however, I encountered rigid structures and strictly enforced processes with little flexibility. There was often limited understanding of alternative approaches to work, and I felt pressured to conform to methods that didn’t align with how I function best. This rigid structure amplified the challenges of ADHD, while stifling my ability to bring my strengths to the forefront. In these environments, I found myself struggling as a result.
Recognising the Potential of ADHD Strengths in the Workplace
Through these contrasting experiences, I realised that while my ADHD challenges remained constant, my ability to utilise my strengths was significantly influenced by the environment, including the acceptance of my differences by those around me. Some workplaces allowed me to maximise my capabilities, while others hindered them. This insight led me to pursue a PhD, focusing on ADHD in professional environments. Rather than just examining the difficulties faced by ADHD employees, I wanted to highlight the strengths and explore the specific workplace conditions that either foster or inhibit these strengths.
Research supports the notion that ADHD brings unique strengths. Dr Heiner Lachenmeier’s book ADHD and Success at Work, for instance, describes how people with ADHD often have a “wider breadth of association” due to a reduced filtering of incoming information, which enhances creativity and problem-solving abilities.
Research by Dr Nancy Doyle on neurodivergence in the workplace, combined with studies on creativity and imagination by White and Shah demonstrate that ADHD individuals can excel in environments that embrace cognitive diversity. Creativity, for instance, is often heightened in ADHD individuals due to the way they process information, thinking beyond traditional boundaries. However, these strengths can only be fully realised in workplaces that are flexible, supportive, and open to alternative working styles.
Dr Edward Hallowell also discusses this in his book Driven to Distraction at Work, noting that ADHD can fuel high energy, hyperfocus, and enthusiasm when supported in the right way. Additionally, Prof Amanda Kirby and Theo Smith, in The Power of Neurodiversity at Work, as well as Leanne Maskell in ADHD Works at Work, advocate for environments that understand and embrace neurodiversity, highlighting the benefits employees with ADHD can bring to the workplace.
Developing Targeted ADHD Training Courses
This studying inevitably led to increasing my own understanding of ADHD and its impact on my work, and the more I learned, the more it became evident that many workplaces lack the necessary understanding and support for neurodivergent employees. Despite increased emphasis on diversity and inclusion, neurodivergence (including ADHD) is still very often misunderstood, with much of the current training being very broad and general, not focusing enough on individual conditions. I saw, and experienced, the need for specific training to address not only the challenges but also the strengths associated with ADHD, and the resulting understanding from workplace peers who might have neurotypical only expectations of skills like communication and approaches to tasks.
This realisation led me to transform my PhD literature review into two targeted training courses. The first course is designed for businesses, specifically aimed at training managers, HR, and colleagues of people with ADHD, focuses on understanding ADHD from a balanced perspective, covering how ADHD employees think differently, the areas in which they may need support, and how workplaces can harness their unique strengths. It encourages flexibility, trust, and space for creativity, which are key to enabling ADHD employees to thrive.
The second course is geared towards educators, providing ADHD training for teachers, TAs, and SEN staff, to equip them with the knowledge to reassure ADHD children and teenagers on how ADHD doesn’t have to limit them as they grow up, and that in fact they their ADHD also brings strengths, such as creative thinking and resilience. By emphasising these positive traits, educators can help ADHD students see their future as one filled with potential and opportunity.
The Diversifying the Curriculum Conference 2025
Written by Bennie Kara
Co-Founder of Diverse Educators
At Diverse Educators’ Diversifying the Curriculum Conference, Hannah Wilson started the event by reminding us all that the work on ensuring curriculum is deep, broad and diverse is not done yet. Our speakers certainly reminded us just how much we can do to make sure that we are constructing a curriculum for all.
Christine Counsell’s opening keynote was joyful to listen to, not least in part due to her incredible depth of awareness and knowledge about the humanities curriculum. She connected effective learning to effective curriculum design and spoke about how thoroughness is possible and how thin unconnected content does not serve the needs of our children. She reminded us that the humanities are replete with story and that each lesson should have children longing for the next one. In her keynote, she recognised the need to work hard to deliver unfamiliar content but also how that hard work pays off when students have experienced language, symbols and narratives repeatedly throughout the curriculum from year 3 onwards in her words meaning comes from relationships with everything else and that the curriculum should be a series of constant bursts of energy fueled by indirect residents and anticipation.
In Emily Folurunsho’s session, we were treated to an in-depth look at Black British history and how important it is to ensure that British students learn about Black British history and not just the history of Black Americans. She was clear in her message that the first time that students encounter a black figure from history should not be through the lens of enslavement. She talked us through three themes that allow us as educators to give a fuller picture of Black British history as possible. She talked about figures from the pre-Anglo-Saxon past, from the Tudor age and from the Victorian age. It is important, she said, that we study Windrush and its legacy, but that we also contextualise Windrush in light of broader race relations in the mid 20th century. She talked compellingly about how Black British history has a connecting influence in terms of providing representation and presence for black students, touching on her own history in Britain and how she personally learned about Black history. She went on to explore how Black British history is challenged in its presence and its validity. To ensure that Black British history is truly embedded into the curriculum, we must seek sources from Black voices and we must refer to Black historians.
In David Bartlett’s session on the global boyhood initiative, we learned about the need for healthy masculinity and healthy emotions in boys and how that goes hand in hand with healthy gender expectations. He explored what healthy gender expectations look like and how to facilitate young people in breaking free from limitations. In his session he explored gender differences and gender stereotypes, asking: what is nature and what is nurture? He highlighted the idea of pink and blue roles in the development of gender identity and responsibility.
Dana Saxon’s session on roots and relevance started with Dana’s personal experience of history as a subject. She talked about how history was not for her in her early experiences and how she felt that her history had been erased. It was only as an adult that she started family history research and that gave her a sense of personal ownership of her story and the ability to create and curate the family archive. She explored the disconnect in history teaching, asking who decides which histories are more important and invited us to consider who is remembered and who this suggests matters. She was clear in her message that history has been distorted, disfigured and destroyed and that erased histories disempower people. She stressed the need to find untold stories and the stories of migration because there are empowering stories hidden deep in our archives. It is a way, she said, of connecting the dots and answering the questions: how did we get here and why does it matter?
Samantha Wharton spoke about Black British literature. She referenced her work and resources on Leave Taking by Winsome Pinnock. Focusing on this text, she explored the context of Pinnock’s play and how teachers can take a cross curricular approach in delivering lessons on it. The text, according to Wharton, is a valuable insight into shared immigrant experiences, family dynamics, the generation gap and matriarchal figures, as well as themes of education and what is deemed sub normal. She encouraged us to go beyond the classroom when exploring literary texts like Leave Taking. She referenced the work of Lit in Colour, outlining the statistics on representation in literature and explored how a simple audit activity can develop thinking about diversity in the curriculum.
Krys McInnis’ session touched on the journey between diversifying the curriculum and decolonizing the curriculum. He asked us to consider positionality in approaching this process, stressing that all people have lived experience and we all have different starting points when undertaking curriculum reform. He spoke compellingly about redistributing power, centring the voices of the colonised and challenging the notion of who holds knowledge and how we make space for marginalised voices and epistemologies. He told us that unlearning is needed and that we need to be willing to adjust, not just approach the process of decolonization as a road map or a checklist so that we can say we are done. In essence he asked us to rethink knowledge and also how language is used today to define power and perspective.
I finished my day listening to Shammi Rahman talking about how RE can help us embrace unity. It was shocking to hear that 500 secondary schools report delivering 0 hours of RE and that led Shammi to ask the question: what is the value of RE for staff, for students, for communities and for parents especially when it can prevent misunderstandings and misconceptions around people and their faiths. Shammi helped us understand that children may be missing out on the opportunity to talk and listen as it is such a central skill in RE and that, in doing so as teachers, we can help them avoid generalisations about groups of people. She stressed that it is difficult to have broad knowledge but that we do need to make time to read and to become comfortable with being uncomfortable in delivering certain aspects of RE. We cannot let our fear of offending people or getting names wrong prevent us from teaching RE lessons that are outside of our own experiences. She went on to talk about what difference it may have made to her peers if they knew about the contributions of her community to the national story. She stressed the need to use quality resources, referencing the work of Mary Myatt and also the work of Nikki McGee. McGee’s work on Black history tours to enrich the curriculum is an excellent source of support for teachers. She finished by reminding us that the beauty of RE is in its intersections.
David Lowbridge-Ellis’s closing keynote reminded us that working in diversity, equity and inclusion is often an unpaid, frustrating and thankless job. He also reminded us that we need to articulate our commitment to the work and to keep bringing about the message of why this work is important. He referenced the work of Dr Rudine Sims Bishop in 1990 on the importance of windows, mirrors and sliding doors as a key metaphor. He pointed out that the choices we make in the resources and examples we put in front of our students may result in students feeling like they belong in the classroom. That it is crucial to make sure that there are windows into the world outside of students so that they are developing a broad cultural capital. He too referenced the work of Lit in Colour. But he returned to his driver and one that perhaps we should all pay attention to, the need to have children we are serving to have a better school experience then we did. It is incredibly important that our values show that we are committed to this work. And it is not just about the curriculum, he spoke about accountability and how some people have the opportunity to shape and influence recruitment, to shape development priorities and equality’s objectives. This is a large sphere of influence.
It was not possible to attend every single session, as much as I would have liked to. But there were common threads and I hope that you can see them in this summary. The Diversifying the Curriculum Conference remains as relevant as it did five years ago because as we said at the start, the work is not yet done.
Cancer helped my Autistic daughter to survive school
Written by Joanne Robinson
Joanne Robinson, BA, MA, PGCE, FCCT, is the Director for Training and Development at TeachUp, a company specialising in professional development for teachers in the UK and internationally. She has also led a number of teacher training programmes, including an iPGCE and an MA in Education with Pedagogy. Prior to this, she taught in secondary education for 16 years. She is keen to promote inclusive education that centres upon the wellbeing and autonomy of teachers as well as pupils.
Making the statement that cancer helped my daughter to survive school sounds quite alarming, but it is something that she and I have discussed at length over the years since this happened to her.
This blog is written with her permission. She is now 26 years old and thriving, so this did occur some time ago. However, the reason I’m writing this now is that I believe it is still resonant for school practices today.
Abigail was diagnosed with leukaemia in January 2011. She was 12 years old at the time, which is quite unusual for this type of cancer. She had just started Year 8 in the school I was also teaching at. Abi had already been diagnosed with Autism just before beginning in secondary. Since then, she has had a further diagnosis of ADHD.
Treatment for leukaemia was gruelling, with two bouts of intensive chemotherapy in the first nine months followed by two years of maintenance chemo. This was the standard protocol for girls back then, although it may have changed as cancer treatments evolve rapidly, thanks to fantastic research trials.
Children may experience some infection, but our consultant advised that life should be normal during the maintenance phase of treatment. However, because Abi was becoming a teenager and experiencing hormonal changes, we found that this wasn’t the case. In the end, she was hospitalised around ten times during her care. Some of those stays were over a month in length and at one, terrifying, point, she contracted neutropenic sepsis and was lucky to have survived.
Abi’s attendance in school was understandably low. It was a really hard two years and, in the end, she dropped back a year in order to regain some of the lost time.
School was brilliant with her. They provided her with a reduced timetable. Because she had very low immunity and her platelet levels meant she was vulnerable to bleeding from knocks and bruises, she was able to spend her breaks in the SEND inclusion room.
Before cancer, Abi was struggling in school because of the difficulties that she had due to her Autism. She found the high school environment very overwhelming to navigate. She was experiencing frequent meltdowns at home. During treatment, she was able to take school at an easier pace, spending time having respite in the SEND room and not forced to interact with other pupils at breaks unless she chose to. Suddenly, her school life was manageable for her.
After treatment ended, Abi’s needs were well-known. Chemotherapy has long-term effects on energy, so school was happy to continue with a reduced timetable and flexibility in allowing Abi breaks when she needed them. She was also in regular attendance in the SEND room. These things were there for her without her having to ask for them – self advocacy can be hard for any child, let alone those with communication difficulties (many time-out systems put the onus on the student to instigate them, which means they are never used).
By the time Abi reached her GCSEs, she did astonishingly well. She was then able to use a similar approach to her time in the school’s Sixth Form.
Abi has since said to me that the accommodations that school made for her cancer were what made it possible for her to complete her studies as a neurodivergent student. In my own teaching experience, I had witnessed many neurodivergent children being unable to cope by the time they reached GCSE: the sheer energy it took to mask every day through this stressful time, repressing behaviours that might be seen as strange by others, would result in them refusing to attend.
There is a lesson here. We have to adapt school practice to accommodate the fluctuating energy levels that occur with neurodivergence. These pupils are often academically capable and should be attaining great outcomes, taking those first steps into fulfilling adult lives. Instead, they are burning out in their teens. Simple changes can adjust the classroom to make it more accessible, and enabling respite or shorter days could be the difference between a neurodivergent child completing school or not.
It should not take a serious illness to ensure proper accommodations are made: neurodivergence is a disability that needs reasonable adjustment from the outset. I think the tide is turning and there is great work being done to raise awareness, but we have a way to go before we can claim with certainty that education is equitable for neurodivergent students.